We'll see if it's fun, I've never seen a show like that, but in general, I haven't been much of a fan of dancing-type shows. And here's my confession, an all-girls show doesn't really interest me that much. Discounting the "scantily clad members of the preferred sex" angle entirely, it's just easier for me to appreciate a mixed cast or a mostly male group.
But I can appreciate spectacle...but now, things change, and I have to buy my own tickets. Grump, grump.
Ach, well, I shall go and appreciate the truly ludicrous number of sequins involved.
Profile
![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif)
spottylogic- Spotty Logic
- The Front Porch Project, Austin
Comments
Too bad someone didn't suggest one of the Cirque Du Soliel (sp?) shows...
Expect there to be a number of 'naughty' (in that 60's, giggly sort of way) production numbers, a few individual acts of varying levels of cheese (jugglers, singers, magician, comedian) and a couple of sequins and feathers dance numbers.
The reason that show was likely chosen is that they are, unsurprisingly, the cheaper shows in town.
All the *big* shows (the various flavors of cirque du solei, blue man group, etc) are all likely more than $100-$150 per ticket.
personally, if you can carve out time for blue man group, I would.
ditto the Mystere show of Cirque. It was pretty wonderful.
If possible, Penn and Teller are playing there, too.
I've been to a burlesque show or two, it's not so much about the sex as the sniggering. And I can certainly applaud a can-can, I'm mostly grousing about having to pay for something that wouldn't have been my first-third choice, this has been a poor month!
But...spectacle can be a good thing.
All this and slightly rubbery cornish hen and a dinner roll!
So maybe the Follies will recognize as well that a litte variety spices up a show.
I guess my geek is showing.