Spotty Logic (spottylogic) wrote,
Spotty Logic

Final round: Opinions on 4th ed--

Okay, I've had time to page through most of the books in the new 4th ed trilogy now.

Overall, I love what they've done to sleek down the basic rules engine, and character design and alignment have a "back to basics" feel that I admire. I worry that, with just the basic rules, there's not enough options to keep characters from looking pretty similer, once a group has worked out what the best combinations are, but that's a minor issue.

My biggest gripe--they've left out a lot of magic items, they've left out a lot of signiture monsters, they've left out a lot of main classes, and in each case, there's a "but they'll be coming up in future books!" I feel a bit like I spent more money for a lot less content--the fonts are bigger, the pictures take up more space, and they've just told me that I'll be able to purchase what I feel like I'm missing in my core book. So, they've clearly got their release schedule filled out for the next few years.

Illustrations...meh. Not as good as 3.5, definately not as good as 3.0.

These books are great on the mechanics front, but I'm finding them very dull to read. I'm not sure I can sustain interest to spend the $$$ on a full library, though I'm sure I'll get the Book of Fighters and Wizards when they come out.

  • Aww :)

    So for YEARS the University of Texas Pagan, Vampire Larp, and GLBT groups tended to cluster around a particular oak tree in the west mall. I think we…

  • cargrump

    Whoof. I've taken a few beatings over the last few days over this. My office is moving across town, which spells an end for my nice little commute…

  • Tonight's experiment--

    Okay, so it's Dogai's birthday tonight. Bauson said that D really liked "biscoff" cookies, which are buttery little things with a touch of spice, and…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened